|
ECONOMIC RECOVERY PLAYS
|
- “We’re looking for a V-shaped recovery,” says
Moffatt, citing the Federal Reserve’s timely and dramatic
easing of short-term interest rates. He expects a turnaround
in the fourth quarter.
|
| Moffatt’s
Picks |
Consumer Cyclicals:
Retailers, Autos
|
A play on continued consumer spending |
Paper
Chemicals
Basic Metals |
A
stronger economy will enhance the prospects for
these cyclical industries, while a more inflationary
environment will boost their pricing power |
Energy
|
Benefits from a supply shortage
and greater inflation |
| Pans |
Foods
|
In a stronger economy,
the group’s stability is less attractive |
Electrical
Utilities
|
A recession play that
peaked with the bond market |
Health Care
Pharmaceuticals |
Another defensive sector,
inflation is a negative |
Banks
|
Personal bankruptcies rising;
telecom lending issues yet to be resolved |
| Neutral-to-Negative |
| Technology |
Capital spending outlook is
poor, and “death toll” of non-viable companies is mounting. |
|
In the next year,
Moffatt expects measures of inflation, such as the consumer price index,
producer price index and GDP deflator, to play key roles in determining
stock performance. That’s because “inflation is already a
bugger problem than people think,” he says.
In his most recent newsletter, Moffatt observes that while
the economy slumped dramatically in April and May, inflationary pressure
remains. Weighing changes in other factors, such as the dollar, interest
rates, inventories and the general economic climate, he concludes that
consumer cyclical's are now the best investments.
Moffatt also is keen on paper, chemicals and basic materials stocks,
as he believes a more inflationary environment will boost their pricing power.
Too, energy-related stocks are bound to benefit from a nationwide power shortage.
Conversely, Moffatt recommends that investors avoid food, consumer
growth, electric utility, insurance and health-care stocks. These groups perform
best when the economy begins to slow significantly, he explains.
Like any market seer, Moffatt has made his share of misguided pronouncements.
His macroeconomic indicators pointed mistakenly to a recession in 1995.
He also steered clients clear of the run-up in technology stocks
in the late 1990s. And, he was right to call techmania a bubble long before the
rest of the world came to view it that way.
Yet, Moffatt’s clients have stood by him, and appreciate
his early-warning system. “He has been 75% right with his calls, which
is an unbelievably great batting average in this business,” says Dan Szente
, chief investment officer for the California Public Employees’ Retirement
System.
If Moffatt’s current call on the economy proves correct,
chances are he won’t be the only Texan smiling. |
sought from Moffatt since he hung out his
shingle in New England 19 years ago.
After graduating from the University of Texas and obtaining
a masters in engineering from New York University in 1968, Moffatt,
now 60 years old, headed for Wall Street, where he worked for a time
as an analyst and portfolio manager under George Soros , at Arnold
and S. Bleichroder . Later, as a technology analyst at Blythe Eastman
Dillon , he experienced firsthand the dark side of Wall Street’s
research machine; he says he was fired for writing a negative report
on IBM , recommending that the firm’s clients sell the stock.
Moffatt claims that the price of virtually |
any common stock is attributable to three
factors: 25% is due to the macroeconomic backdrop, 25% to the fundamentals
unique to that company and 50% to market influences. Accordingly, his
quantitative research model relates changes in 20 macroeconomic factors
to the universe of Russell 2000 stocks, with the aim of determining which
industry groups are likely to perform best over the coming six months
to a year.
Every May, Analytic Systems selects those 20 factors
from the wide world of economic data that Moffatt expects will be relevant
in picking winning stocks in the next year. The company then follows
the monthly trends in the factors andupdates
the impact on specific industries. |
|
|
|